Amperse v. Circuit Judge

Michigan Supreme Court

Amperse v. Circuit Judge

1 McGrath 592, 14 McGrath 33

DecidedNovember 11, 1865

StatusPublished

This text of 1 McGrath 592 (Amperse v. Circuit Judge) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amperse v. Circuit Judge, 1 McGrath 592, 14 McGrath 33 (Mich. 1865).

Pincite

Opinion

To compel entry of an order specifying that relator was entitled to double costs.

Denied November 11, 1865.

Held, that under Comp. Laws, Sec. 3736, relator, as plaintiff was entitled to double costs, and no such order was necessary to perfect his right; that plaintiff should have appealed from the the decision of the taxing officer to the Circuit Court, and from, the decision of that court, if adverse, to this court by writ of error.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

To compel entry of an order specifying that relator was entitled to double costs.

Denied November 11, 1865.

Held, that under Comp. Laws, Sec. 3736, relator, as plaintiff was entitled to double costs, and no such order was necessary to perfect his right; that plaintiff should have appealed from the the decision of the taxing officer to the Circuit Court, and from, the decision of that court, if adverse, to this court by writ of error.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 McGrath 592, 14 McGrath 33, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amperse-v-circuit-judge-mich-1865.