Home/Supreme Court/Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York

Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York

379 U.S. 5, 85 S. Ct. 47
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided October 12, 1964·No. 152·Published

Opinion

379 U.S. 5 (1964)

AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS' OFFSET CORP. ET AL.
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.

No. 152.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 12, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Harold Riegelman and H. H. Nordlinger for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for the City of New York et al., and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Gustave Soderberg, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York, 379 U.S. 5, 85 S. Ct. 47 (1964).

379 U.S. 5 (Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.