Home/Supreme Court/Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York

Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York

379 U.S. 5, 85 S. Ct. 47
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 12, 1964
Docket152
StatusPublished

This text of 379 U.S. 5 (Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. New York, 379 U.S. 5, 85 S. Ct. 47 (1964).

Opinion

379 U.S. 5 (1964)

AMPCO PRINTING-ADVERTISERS' OFFSET CORP. ET AL.
v.
CITY OF NEW YORK ET AL.

No. 152.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided October 12, 1964.
APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEALS OF NEW YORK.

Harold Riegelman and H. H. Nordlinger for appellants.

Leo A. Larkin, Stanley Buchsbaum and Samuel J. Warms for the City of New York et al., and Louis J. Lefkowitz, Attorney General of New York, Samuel A. Hirshowitz, First Assistant Attorney General, and Gustave Soderberg, Assistant Attorney General, for Lefkowitz, appellees.

PER CURIAM.

The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
379 U.S. 5, 85 S. Ct. 47, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ampco-printing-advertisers-offset-corp-v-new-york-scotus-1964.