Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. City of New York
379 U.S. 5
Opinion
The motion to dismiss is granted and the appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. City of New York, 379 U.S. 5 (1964).
379 U.S. 5 (Ampco Printing-Advertisers' Offset Corp. v. City of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Metropolitan Package Store Ass'n v. Koch
89 A.D.2d 317 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)
Citibank v. CITY FIN. ADMIN.
43 N.Y.2d 425 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Citibank, N. A. v. City of New York Finance Administration
372 N.E.2d 789 (New York Court of Appeals, 1977)
Capelle v. Makowski
93 Misc. 2d 436 (New York Supreme Court, 1977)
Carey Transportation, Inc. v. Triborough Bridge & Tunnel Authority
345 N.E.2d 281 (New York Court of Appeals, 1976)
ASSN. OF BAR, CITY OF NY v. Lewisohn
313 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Association of the Bar of New York v. Lewisohn
313 N.E.2d 30 (New York Court of Appeals, 1974)
Saratoga Harness Racing, Inc. v. New York State Quarter Horse Racing Commission
74 Misc. 2d 1096 (New York Supreme Court, 1972)
Roosevelt Raceway, Inc. v. County of Nassau
218 N.E.2d 539 (New York Court of Appeals, 1966)
Roosevelt Raceway, Inc. v. County of Nassau
25 A.D.2d 535 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1966)