Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Goodale

62 N.H. 66
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided June 5, 1882·Published

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

The only question raised by the defendants is as to the constitutionality of the statute of 1868, commonly known as the flowage act. This question has been repeatedly decided adversely to the claim of the defendants, and is not now to be regarded as an open one in this jurisdiction. Company v. Fernald, 47 N. H. 444; Ash v. Cummings, 50 N. H. 591; Company v. Head, 56 N. H. 386; Company v. Worcester, 60 N. H. 522.

Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, Smith, and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Goodale, 62 N.H. 66 (N.H. 1882).

62 N.H. 66 (Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Goodale) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Worcester
60 N.H. 522 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1881)