Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Goodale

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Goodale

62 N.H. 66

DecidedJune 5, 1882

StatusPublished

This text of 62 N.H. 66 (Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Goodale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amoskeag Manufacturing Co. v. Goodale, 62 N.H. 66 (N.H. 1882).

Pincite

Opinion

Blodgett, J.

The only question raised by the defendants is as to the constitutionality of the statute of 1868, commonly known as the flowage act. This question has been repeatedly decided adversely to the claim of the defendants, and is not now to be regarded as an open one in this jurisdiction. Company v. Fernald, 47 N. H. 444; Ash v. Cummings, 50 N. H. 591; Company v. Head, 56 N. H. 386; Company v. Worcester, 60 N. H. 522.

Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, Smith, and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Blodgett, J.

The only question raised by the defendants is as to the constitutionality of the statute of 1868, commonly known as the flowage act. This question has been repeatedly decided adversely to the claim of the defendants, and is not now to be regarded as an open one in this jurisdiction. Company v. Fernald, 47 N. H. 444; Ash v. Cummings, 50 N. H. 591; Company v. Head, 56 N. H. 386; Company v. Worcester, 60 N. H. 522.

Exceptions overruled.

Stanley, Smith, and Clark, JJ., did not sit: the others concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

62 N.H. 66, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amoskeag-manufacturing-co-v-goodale-nh-1882.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack