Amos v. State
873 S.W.2d 956, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 1994 WL 144984
Opinion
ORDER
Movant appeals the motion court’s denial of his ineffective assistance of counsel claim following an evidentiary hearing. We affirm. We find no error of law appears, and the findings of fact issued by the motion court in denying Movant’s motion are not clearly erroneous. Rule 84.16(b)(2) and (5).
We further find an opinion in this case would have no precedential value and affirm by written order. Rule 84.16(b). A memorandum has been issued to the parties for their use only.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amos v. State, 873 S.W.2d 956, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 684, 1994 WL 144984 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).
873 S.W.2d 956 (Amos v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.