Amos v. Kelly

District Court, D. Minnesota·Decided August 4, 2025·No. 0:22-cv-02108·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MINNESOTA

Howard W. Amos, Civ. No. 22-2108 (JWB/DLM)

Plaintiff, ORDER ACCEPTING v. REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF MAGISTRATE JUDGE Ryan Kelly and Kurtis Schoonover, sued in their individual and official capacities,

Defendants.

United States Magistrate Judge Douglas L. Micko issued a Report and Recommendation (“R&R”) on July 15, 2025. (Doc. No. 119.) No objection has been filed to the R&R in the time permitted. In the absence of timely objections, the R&R is reviewed for clear error. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(b); Grinder v. Gammon, 73 F.3d 793, 795 (8th Cir. 1996). Upon review of the R&R, no clear error is found. Based on the R&R of the Magistrate Judge, and on all of the files, records, and proceedings herein, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. The July 15, 2025 Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 119) is ACCEPTED; 2. Defendants Ryan Kelly and Kurtis Schoonover’s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. No. 91) is GRANTED; and 3. All claims against Defendants Ryan Kelly and Kurtis Schoonover are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. 4. This action is DISMISSED with prejudice. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY. Date: August 4, 2025 s/ Jerry W. Blackwell JERRY W. BLACKWELL United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amos v. Kelly, (mnd 2025).

Amos v. Kelly (Amos v. Kelly) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related