Amos v. City of Cleveland Heights

169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 367
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 1, 1959
DocketNo. 35803
StatusPublished

This text of 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 367 (Amos v. City of Cleveland Heights) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amos v. City of Cleveland Heights, 169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 367 (Ohio 1959).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The record does not disclose a defect of such a substantial nature as to impose liability upon defendant under Section 723.01, Revised Code. The facts bring the case within the rule laid down in Gallagher v. City of Toledo, 168 Ohio St., 508, 156 N. E. (2d), 466, and Buckley v. City of Portsmouth, 168 Ohio St., 513, 156 N. E. (2d), 468. The judgment of the Court of Appeals is affirmed on authority of those cases, and final judgment is rendered for defendant.

Judgment affirmed.

Weygandt, C. J., Zimmerman, Taet, Matthias, Bell, Herbert and Peck, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
169 Ohio St. (N.S.) 367, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amos-v-city-of-cleveland-heights-ohio-1959.