Amos v. Blue Cross NM

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedJune 19, 2003
Docket03-30064
StatusUnpublished

This text of Amos v. Blue Cross NM (Amos v. Blue Cross NM) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amos v. Blue Cross NM, (5th Cir. 2003).

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit F I L E D IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT June 18, 2003

Charles R. Fulbruge III Clerk No. 03-30064 Summary Calendar

MATTIE AMOS,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

BLUE CROSS & BLUE SHIELD OF NEW MEXICO, a Division of Health Care Service Corporation, a Mutual Legal Reserve Company; DAVID DAVEFIEDLER; KATHY GRIFFIN; DEBBIE DIXON; BONNIE MICHALSKI; KEN GODBOLD; JIM STREET, doing business as Healthcare Financial Administration,

Defendants-Appellees.

KATHY GRIFFIN; DEBBIE DIXON; BONNIE MICHALSKI; KEN GODBOLD,

Defendants-Appellees. -------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Louisiana USDC Nos. 01-CV-759 & 02-CV-1222 --------------------

Before BARKSDALE, DeMOSS, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Mattie Amos, a former Medicare provider, appeals the district

court’s dismissal for lack of jurisdiction of her claims arising

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. under the Medicare Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 1395 et seq. Amos alleged in

the district court that the defendants committed fraud by

intentionally falsifying Medicare records in order to steal

“millions of dollars” from Amos’s business, P.D.C. Home Health Care

Services. Amos does not dispute that she has failed to exhaust her

administrative remedies as required by the Medicare Act. Under

these circumstances, the district court lacked jurisdiction over

Amos’s complaint. Heckler v. Ringer, 466 U.S. 602, 605-07 & n.1

(1984); Riley Hosp. & Benevolent Ass’n v. Bowen, 804 F.2d 302, 304

(5th Cir. 1986).

In light of the fact that federal jurisdiction does not exist,

we pretermit consideration of Amos’s other appellate arguments.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Heckler v. Ringer
466 U.S. 602 (Supreme Court, 1984)
Riley Hospital & Benevolent Ass'n v. Bowen
804 F.2d 302 (Fifth Circuit, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amos v. Blue Cross NM, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amos-v-blue-cross-nm-ca5-2003.