Amos Camille v. Miami-Dade County, MDCR

Opinion

[DO NOT PUBLISH]

In the

United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit

____________________

No. 24-13055

Non-Argument Calendar

____________________

AMOS CAMILLE, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus MIAMI-DADE COUNTY, MDCR,

Defendant-Appellee.

____________________

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-23949-RKA

____________________

2

2 Opinion of the Court 24-13055

Before JILL PRYOR, ABUDU, and KIDD, Circuit Judges. PER CURIAM:

Amos Camille’s notice of appeal, filed on September 17, 2024, is untimely to appeal from the district court’s judgement dismissing his case, deemed entered on April 8, 2024. See 28 U.S.C. § 2107(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 58(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A), 4(a)(7)(A)(ii), 26(a)(1)(C). We construed Camille’s notice of appeal as a motion for Rule 4(a)(6) relief and remanded the case to the district court to determine whether such relief was warranted. See Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(6); Sanders v. United States, 113 F.3d 184, 186-88 (11th Cir. 1997). On remand, the district court denied that construed motion.

Accordingly, this appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction. See Green v. Drug Enf’t Admin., 606 F.3d 1296, 1300 (11th Cir. 2010) (explaining that, in civil cases, the timely filing of a notice of appeal is a mandatory prerequisite to the exercise of appellate jurisdiction). All pending motions are DENIED as moot.