Amory, Earl Oscar

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedNovember 23, 2016
DocketWR-85,950-01
StatusPublished

This text of Amory, Earl Oscar (Amory, Earl Oscar) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amory, Earl Oscar, (Tex. 2016).

Opinion

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TEXAS NO. WR-85,950-01

EX PARTE EARL OSCAR AMORY, Applicant

ON APPLICATION FOR A WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS CAUSE NO. 1220039-A IN THE 338TH DISTRICT COURT FROM HARRIS COUNTY

Per curiam.

OPINION

Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the

clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court this application for a writ of habeas corpus. Ex parte

Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant pleaded guilty to possession of a

controlled substance, and was sentenced pursuant to Section 12.44(a) of the Texas Penal Code to 120

days in county jail. He did not appeal his conviction.

Applicant contends that his plea was involuntary and that his conviction violates due process

because after he entered his plea, the evidence in his case was tested and found not to contain any

controlled substance or dangerous drug. Although Applicant has discharged his sentence in this 2

case, he alleges that he is suffering continuing consequences as a result of this conviction. Those

continuing consequences are sufficient to allow this Court to address his claims. Ex parte

Harrington, 310 S.W.3d 452, 456-57 (Tex. Crim. App. 2010).

The parties have entered agreed findings of fact and conclusions of law, and the trial court

has determined that Applicant’s decision to plead guilty in this case was not a voluntary and

intelligent choice. Applicant is entitled to relief. Ex parte Mable, 443 S.W.3d 129 (Tex. Crim. App.

2014).

Relief is granted. The judgment in Cause No. 1220039 in the 338th District Court of Harris

County is set aside, and Applicant is remanded to the custody of the Sheriff of Harris County to

answer the charges as set out in the indictment. The trial court shall issue any necessary bench

warrant within 10 days after the mandate of this Court issues.

Copies of this opinion shall be sent to the Texas Department of Criminal Justice–Correctional

Institutions Division and Pardons and Paroles Division.

Delivered: November 23, 2016 Do not publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ex Parte Harrington
310 S.W.3d 452 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2010)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)
Mable, Kendrick
443 S.W.3d 129 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Amory, Earl Oscar, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amory-earl-oscar-texcrimapp-2016.