Amorello v. Tauck
824 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10301, 2002 WL 1626148
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided July 24, 2002·No. No. 4D01-4666·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
We grant appellant’s motion for reversal of the judgment for prevailing party attorney’s fees and costs based on our reversal of the main judgment. Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amorello v. Tauck, 824 So. 2d 244, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 10301, 2002 WL 1626148 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).
824 So. 2d 244 (Amorello v. Tauck) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
PROGRESSIVE EXPRESS INSURANCE COMPANY v. Menendez
979 So. 2d 335 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2008)