Amore v. Frankel

621 A.2d 286, 225 Conn. 904, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 76
Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided February 11, 1993·No. SC 14689·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendant commissioner’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 29 Conn. App. 565 (AC 10677), is granted, limited to the following issues:

“1. Does the duty of the commissioner of transportation to maintain highways, bridges and sidewalks under General Statutes § 13a-144 extend to driveways?
[905]*905Decided February 11, 1993 The Supreme Court docket number is SC 14689. Michael 0 ’Sullivan, in support of the petition. Robert J. Enright, in opposition.
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly reverse the trial court’s dismissal of this action on the basis that the complaint stated a cause of action under General Statutes § 13a-144, notwithstanding the affidavits of the defendant indicating that the defendant had no duty to keep the area in question in repair?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amore v. Frankel, 621 A.2d 286, 225 Conn. 904, 1993 Conn. LEXIS 76 (Colo. 1993).

621 A.2d 286 (Amore v. Frankel) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Amore v. Frankel
636 A.2d 786 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1994)