Amolins v. Lubans

195 N.E.2d 513, 346 Mass. 782
CourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
DecidedJanuary 8, 1964
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 195 N.E.2d 513 (Amolins v. Lubans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amolins v. Lubans, 195 N.E.2d 513, 346 Mass. 782 (Mass. 1964).

Opinion

Appeal dismissed. The appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal (see G. L. [Ter. Ed.] e. 231, § 96) from the denial of the appellant’s substitute petition to vacate a judgment (see G. L. c. 250, § 15) in the Superior Court. No matter reviewable under § 96 is presented by the appeal. In particular, no error of law apparent on the record is disclosed. There is no occasion for considering whether the contentions which the appellant seeks to present would have merit if properly before us upon a bill of exceptions. Cf. Russell v. Foley, 278 Mass. 145,148; Mede v. Colbert, 342 Mass. 166,169.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Development Corp. of America v. Rawson
294 N.E.2d 446 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1973)
Longo v. Metropolitan District Commission
231 N.E.2d 576 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
195 N.E.2d 513, 346 Mass. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amolins-v-lubans-mass-1964.