Amolins v. Lubans
This text of 195 N.E.2d 513 (Amolins v. Lubans) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal dismissed. The appellee has moved to dismiss this appeal (see G. L. [Ter. Ed.] e. 231, § 96) from the denial of the appellant’s substitute petition to vacate a judgment (see G. L. c. 250, § 15) in the Superior Court. No matter reviewable under § 96 is presented by the appeal. In particular, no error of law apparent on the record is disclosed. There is no occasion for considering whether the contentions which the appellant seeks to present would have merit if properly before us upon a bill of exceptions. Cf. Russell v. Foley, 278 Mass. 145,148; Mede v. Colbert, 342 Mass. 166,169.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
195 N.E.2d 513, 346 Mass. 782, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amolins-v-lubans-mass-1964.