Amole v. Meyers
66 A. 1133, 69 N.J. Eq. 840, 3 Robb. 840, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 214
This text of 66 A. 1133 (Amole v. Meyers) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Amole v. Meyers, 66 A. 1133, 69 N.J. Eq. 840, 3 Robb. 840, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 214 (N.J. 1905).
Opinion
We concur in the view of the court of chancery that the demurrer is frivolous. The order appealed from should be affirmed.
For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixoh, Garrisok, Port, Garretsok, Pitkey, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredehburgkk, Vroom, Greek, Gray—13.
For reversal—None.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
66 A. 1133, 69 N.J. Eq. 840, 3 Robb. 840, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 214, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amole-v-meyers-nj-1905.