Amole v. Meyers

66 A. 1133, 69 N.J. Eq. 840, 3 Robb. 840, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 214
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 26, 1905·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

We concur in the view of the court of chancery that the demurrer is frivolous. The order appealed from should be affirmed.

For affirmance—The Chief-Justice, Dixoh, Garrisok, Port, Garretsok, Pitkey, Swayze, Reed, Bogert, Vredehburgkk, Vroom, Greek, Gray—13.

For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amole v. Meyers, 66 A. 1133, 69 N.J. Eq. 840, 3 Robb. 840, 1905 N.J. LEXIS 214 (N.J. 1905).

66 A. 1133 (Amole v. Meyers) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.