Amodio v. New York City Housing Authority

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amodio v. New York City Housing Authority

13 A.D.2d 749, 217 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10786

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 18, 1961

StatusPublished

This text of 13 A.D.2d 749 (Amodio v. New York City Housing Authority) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amodio v. New York City Housing Authority, 13 A.D.2d 749, 217 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10786 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1961).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion to dispense with [750]*750printing granted insofar as to dispense with the printing of the record on appeal, appellants’ points and exhibits and to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points and original exhibits, upon condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the attorneys for defendant-respondent and -file 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellants’ points and the original exhibits with this court on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel,■ Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to dismiss appeal granted, with $10 costs, unless the appellants procure the record on appeal and appellants’ points to be served and filed on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Motion to dispense with [750]*750printing granted insofar as to dispense with the printing of the record on appeal, appellants’ points and exhibits and to permit the appeal to be heard upon a typewritten or mimeographed record, without printing the same, and upon typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points and original exhibits, upon condition that the appellants serve one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed record and one copy of the typewritten or mimeographed appellants’ points on the attorneys for defendant-respondent and -file 6 typewritten copies or 19 mimeographed copies of both the record on appeal and appellants’ points and the original exhibits with this court on or before August 15, 1961, with notice of argument for the September 1961 Term of this court, said appeal to be argued or submitted when reached. Concur — Botein, P. J., Breitel,■ Stevens, Eager and Bergan, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

13 A.D.2d 749, 217 N.Y.S.2d 492, 1961 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10786, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amodio-v-new-york-city-housing-authority-nyappdiv-1961.