Amodio v. Amodio
This text of 754 A.2d 160 (Amodio v. Amodio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 459 (AC 15692), is granted, limited to the following issues:
“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly exercised its authority under General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) and improperly applied McHugh v. McHugh, 27 Conn. App. 724, 609 A.2d 250 (1992)?
“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the child support order in this case was nonmodifiable?”
VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
754 A.2d 160, 253 Conn. 910, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amodio-v-amodio-conn-2000.