Amodio v. Amodio

754 A.2d 160, 253 Conn. 910, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 179
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedMay 18, 2000
DocketSC 16312
StatusPublished

This text of 754 A.2d 160 (Amodio v. Amodio) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amodio v. Amodio, 754 A.2d 160, 253 Conn. 910, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 179 (Colo. 2000).

Opinion

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 56 Conn. App. 459 (AC 15692), is granted, limited to the following issues:

[911]*911The Supreme Court docket number is SC 16312. Donald L. Altschuler, in support of the petition. Decided May 18, 2000

“1. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly exercised its authority under General Statutes § 46b-86 (a) and improperly applied McHugh v. McHugh, 27 Conn. App. 724, 609 A.2d 250 (1992)?

“2. Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the child support order in this case was nonmodifiable?”

VERTEFEUILLE, J., did not participate in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McHugh v. McHugh
609 A.2d 250 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 1992)
Amodio v. Amodio
743 A.2d 1135 (Connecticut Appellate Court, 2000)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
754 A.2d 160, 253 Conn. 910, 2000 Conn. LEXIS 179, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amodio-v-amodio-conn-2000.