Amodeo v. Corso
This text of 208 A.D.2d 667 (Amodeo v. Corso) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In an action to set aside a deed, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.) dated February 3, 1993, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of the same court dated November 29, 1982 (Signorelli, J.), on the ground, inter alia, of newly discovered evidence.
Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.
The defendants failed to carry their burden of establishing the materiality of the new evidence (see, H & Y Realty Co. v Baron, 193 AD2d 429). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
208 A.D.2d 667, 618 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9934, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amodeo-v-corso-nyappdiv-1994.