Amodeo v. Corso

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amodeo v. Corso

208 A.D.2d 667, 618 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9934

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 17, 1994·Published

Opinion

In an action to set aside a deed, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.) dated February 3, 1993, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of the same court dated November 29, 1982 (Signorelli, J.), on the ground, inter alia, of newly discovered evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to carry their burden of establishing the materiality of the new evidence (see, H & Y Realty Co. v Baron, 193 AD2d 429). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In an action to set aside a deed, the defendants appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.) dated February 3, 1993, which denied their motion to vacate a judgment of the same court dated November 29, 1982 (Signorelli, J.), on the ground, inter alia, of newly discovered evidence.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The defendants failed to carry their burden of establishing the materiality of the new evidence (see, H & Y Realty Co. v Baron, 193 AD2d 429). Mangano, P. J., Lawrence, Copertino, Krausman and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Amodeo v. Corso, 208 A.D.2d 667, 618 N.Y.S.2d 537, 1994 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

208 A.D.2d 667 (Amodeo v. Corso) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related