Amodeo v. Beverly

184 S.E.2d 922, 13 N.C. App. 244, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1215
CourtCourt of Appeals of North Carolina
DecidedDecember 15, 1971
DocketNo. 713SC631
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 184 S.E.2d 922 (Amodeo v. Beverly) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amodeo v. Beverly, 184 S.E.2d 922, 13 N.C. App. 244, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1215 (N.C. Ct. App. 1971).

Opinion

VAUGHN, Judge.

Ordinarily an appeal does not lie from an interlocutory order and particularly from a pre-trial order. Green v. Insurance Co., 250 N.C. 730, 110 S.E. 2d 321. However, because the purported pre-trial order in the present case amounts to summary judgment against plaintiff on at least one of the issues, we treat plaintiff’s appeal as a petition for certiorari which is hereby allowed. Defendants had not moved for summary judgment and plaintiff had no notice that such was being considered. The “pretrial opinion” filed 25 May 1970 is hereby vacated and the cause is remanded to the Superior Court of Craven County.

Vacated and remanded.

Judges Brock and Britt concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Wells v. Wells
512 S.E.2d 468 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1999)
Knight v. Duke Power Co.
237 S.E.2d 574 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 1977)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
184 S.E.2d 922, 13 N.C. App. 244, 1971 N.C. App. LEXIS 1215, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amodeo-v-beverly-ncctapp-1971.