Amoco Production Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Amoco Production Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.

496 So. 2d 319, 1986 La. LEXIS 7518

Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided October 31, 1986·No. No. 86-CC-1980·Published

Opinion

In re Amoco Production Co.; applying for supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. C-6047; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “I,” No. 86-7425.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and judgment of the district court reinstated. Since respondents did not appeal timely, i.e., within 15 days, (Art. 3612 C.C.P.) they do not have the right to have the court of appeal exercise supervisory jurisdiction after the delays for appeal have expired. Morris v. Transtates Petroleum, Inc., 258 La. 311, 246 So.2d 183 (1971).

WATSON, J., would deny the writ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Amoco Production Co.; applying for supervisory writ; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. C-6047; Parish of Orleans, Civil District Court, Div. “I,” No. 86-7425.

Granted. Judgment of the court of appeal is vacated and judgment of the district court reinstated. Since respondents did not appeal timely, i.e., within 15 days, (Art. 3612 C.C.P.) they do not have the right to have the court of appeal exercise supervisory jurisdiction after the delays for appeal have expired. Morris v. Transtates Petroleum, Inc., 258 La. 311, 246 So.2d 183 (1971).

WATSON, J., would deny the writ.

Amoco Production Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co., 496 So. 2d 319, 1986 La. LEXIS 7518 (La. 1986).

Pincite

496 So. 2d 319 (Amoco Production Co. v. United Gas Pipe Line Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related