Home/Supreme Court/Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe

Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe

526 U.S. 1037, 119 S. Ct. 1331, 143 L. Ed. 2d 496, 67 U.S.L.W. 3597, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2242
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe. Read the opinion of the Court — 526 U.S. 865 →
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided March 29, 1999·No. No. 98-830·Published

Opinion

C. A. 10th Cir. [Certiorari granted, 525 U. S. 1118 and 1130.] Motion of Wyoming for leave to participate in oral argument as amicus curiae and for additional time for oral argument denied without prejudice to filing a motion to divide time with petitioners. Motion of the Solicitor General for divided argument granted.

Justice Breyer took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe, 526 U.S. 1037, 119 S. Ct. 1331, 143 L. Ed. 2d 496, 67 U.S.L.W. 3597, 1999 U.S. LEXIS 2242 (1999).

526 U.S. 1037 (Amoco Production Co. v. Southern Ute Indian Tribe) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.