Amochaev v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

District of Columbia

Amochaev v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

CourtDistrict Court, District of Columbia

DecidedSeptember 22, 2009

DocketCivil Action No. 2011-1785

StatusPublished

This text of Amochaev v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (Amochaev v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amochaev v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., (D.D.C. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination.

C 05-01298 PJH Amochaev et al v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

C 09-04117 SBA Bullen v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. I find that the above case is NOT related to the case assigned to me. PJH

CLERK’S NOTICE

The court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur.

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED: 9/22/09 By: Deputy Clerk

-1-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RELATED CASE ORDER

A Motion for Administrative Relief to Consider Whether Cases Should be Related or a Sua Sponte Judicial Referral for Purpose of Determining Relationship (Civil L.R. 3-12) has been filed. The time for filing an opposition or statement of support has passed. As the judge assigned to the earliest filed case below that bears my initials, I find that the more recently filed case(s) that I have initialed below are related to the case assigned to me, and such case(s) shall be reassigned to me. Any cases listed below that are not related to the case assigned to me are referred to the judge assigned to the next-earliest filed case for a related case determination.

C 05-01298 PJH Amochaev et al v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc.

C 09-04117 SBA Bullen v. Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. I find that the above case is NOT related to the case assigned to me. PJH

CLERK’S NOTICE

The court has reviewed the motion and determined that no cases are related and no reassignments shall occur.

Richard W. Wieking, Clerk

DATED: 9/22/09 By: Deputy Clerk

-1-

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Amochaev v. Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amochaev-v-citigroup-global-markets-inc-dcd-2009.