Amo v. Leonard

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amo v. Leonard

263 A.D. 1061, 34 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8041

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amo v. Leonard. Read the opinion of the Court — 262 A.D. 467 →

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 18, 1942·Published

Opinion

Motion to reopen and reargue former appeal denied, without costs. Memorandum: On this motion to reopen and reargue a former appeal in this case, nothing new is shown to cause us to change our former decision. The refusal of the surrogate to accept the law as laid down by this court is the only fact offered in support of this motion. The surrogate is not a party to the present action and no proceeding is yet pending before this court to compel the surrogate to make and enter an order from which an appeal can be taken. Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [See 262 App. Div. 467.]

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion to reopen and reargue former appeal denied, without costs. Memorandum: On this motion to reopen and reargue a former appeal in this case, nothing new is shown to cause us to change our former decision. The refusal of the surrogate to accept the law as laid down by this court is the only fact offered in support of this motion. The surrogate is not a party to the present action and no proceeding is yet pending before this court to compel the surrogate to make and enter an order from which an appeal can be taken. Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [See 262 App. Div. 467.]

Amo v. Leonard, 263 A.D. 1061, 34 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8041 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1942).

Pincite

263 A.D. 1061 (Amo v. Leonard) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related