Amo v. Leonard
This text of 263 A.D. 1061 (Amo v. Leonard) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Motion to reopen and reargue former appeal denied, without costs. Memorandum: On this motion to reopen and reargue a former appeal in this case, nothing new is shown to cause us to change our former decision. The refusal of the surrogate to accept the law as laid down by this court is the only fact offered in support of this motion. The surrogate is not a party to the present action and no proceeding is yet pending before this court to compel the surrogate to make and enter an order from which an appeal can be taken. Present — Crosby, P. J., Cunningham, Taylor, Dowling and Harris, JJ. [See 262 App. Div. 467.]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
263 A.D. 1061, 34 N.Y.S.2d 355, 1942 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8041, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amo-v-leonard-nyappdiv-1942.