Amo v. Genovese
87 A.2d 576, 9 N.J. 181
This text of 87 A.2d 576 (Amo v. Genovese) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Amo v. Genovese, 87 A.2d 576, 9 N.J. 181 (N.J. 1952).
Opinion
THEODORE AMO, AN INFANT, ETC., ET ALS., PLAINTIFFS-PETITIONERS,
v.
VITO GENOVESE, ET AL., DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.
The Supreme Court of New Jersey.
Messrs. Toolan, Haney & Romond for the petitioners.
Mr. Joseph F. Mattice for the respondents.
Denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
87 A.2d 576, 9 N.J. 181, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amo-v-genovese-nj-1952.