Ammon v. Demayo

Court of Appeals of Texas

Ammon v. Demayo

148 S.W.2d 945

CourtCourt of Appeals of Texas

DecidedJanuary 31, 1941

DocketNo. 2083.

StatusPublished

This text of 148 S.W.2d 945 (Ammon v. Demayo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ammon v. Demayo, 148 S.W.2d 945 (Tex. Ct. App. 1941).

Pincite

Opinion

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by plaintiff, Frank De-Mayo, against Jack Ammon to recover on a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien securing the same. The trial court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for, and the defendant has appealed. The cause is before this court without having been briefed by either party. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

LESLIE, Chief Justice.

This is a suit by plaintiff, Frank De-Mayo, against Jack Ammon to recover on a promissory note and to foreclose a chattel mortgage lien securing the same. The trial court rendered a judgment in favor of the plaintiff as prayed for, and the defendant has appealed. The cause is before this court without having been briefed by either party. The appeal is therefore dismissed. Haynes v. J. M. Radford Grocery Co., 118 Tex. 277, 14 S.W.2d 811.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

148 S.W.2d 945, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ammon-v-demayo-texapp-1941.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack