Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals
786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 938, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 487, 2001 WL 1559474
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedNovember 7, 2001
DocketSC 16614
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 786 A.2d 425 (Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 938, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 487, 2001 WL 1559474 (Colo. 2001).
Opinion
The plaintiffs’ petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 65 Conn. App. 606 (AC 20640), is granted, limited to the following issue:
“Did the Appellate Court properly decline to review, on the basis of an inadequate record, the plaintiffs’ claim regarding res judicata and collateral estoppel?”
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Ammirata v. Zoning Board of Appeals
826 A.2d 170 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2003)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
786 A.2d 425, 258 Conn. 938, 2001 Conn. LEXIS 487, 2001 WL 1559474, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ammirata-v-zoning-board-of-appeals-conn-2001.