Ammerman v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Ammerman v. State

1914 OK CR 181, 143 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 670, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 79

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 3, 1914

DocketNo. A-2015.

StatusPublished

This text of 1914 OK CR 181 (Ammerman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ammerman v. State, 1914 OK CR 181, 143 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 670, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 79 (Okla. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, James Ammerman, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of Pawnee county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of five hundred dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of one hundred and eighty days. There is absolutely no merit in this appeal. The testimony is conclusive as to the guilt of the accused. There are no errors of law justifying a reversal. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed. ■

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiff in error, James Ammerman, was convicted at the March, 1913, term of the county court of Pawnee county on a charge of having unlawful possession of intoxicating liquors, and his punishment fixed at a fine of five hundred dollars and imprisonment in the county jail for a period of one hundred and eighty days. There is absolutely no merit in this appeal. The testimony is conclusive as to the guilt of the accused. There are no errors of law justifying a reversal. The judgment of the trial court is, therefore, affirmed. ■

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1914 OK CR 181, 143 P. 1196, 11 Okla. Crim. 670, 1914 Okla. Crim. App. LEXIS 79, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ammerman-v-state-oklacrimapp-1914.