Ammerman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ammerman v. State

617 So. 2d 836, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4998, 1993 WL 140116

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMay 5, 1993

DocketNo. 92-1732

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 617 So. 2d 836 (Ammerman v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ammerman v. State, 617 So. 2d 836, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4998, 1993 WL 140116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals an order of restitution entered after pleading nolo contendere to theft. The state concedes that the order requiring restitution of $5,033 should be reduced by $860. We also conclude it should be further reduced by $85 because the evidence does not support that amount being included in what defendant was ordered to pay. We therefore remand with instructions that the order of restitution be reduced to $4,088.

Reversed.

STONE, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals an order of restitution entered after pleading nolo contendere to theft. The state concedes that the order requiring restitution of $5,033 should be reduced by $860. We also conclude it should be further reduced by $85 because the evidence does not support that amount being included in what defendant was ordered to pay. We therefore remand with instructions that the order of restitution be reduced to $4,088.

Reversed.

STONE, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

617 So. 2d 836, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4998, 1993 WL 140116, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ammerman-v-state-fladistctapp-1993.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack