Ammerman v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Ammerman v. State

617 So. 2d 836, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4998, 1993 WL 140116

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided May 5, 1993·No. No. 92-1732·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals an order of restitution entered after pleading nolo contendere to theft. The state concedes that the order requiring restitution of $5,033 should be reduced by $860. We also conclude it should be further reduced by $85 because the evidence does not support that amount being included in what defendant was ordered to pay. We therefore remand with instructions that the order of restitution be reduced to $4,088.

Reversed.

STONE, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals an order of restitution entered after pleading nolo contendere to theft. The state concedes that the order requiring restitution of $5,033 should be reduced by $860. We also conclude it should be further reduced by $85 because the evidence does not support that amount being included in what defendant was ordered to pay. We therefore remand with instructions that the order of restitution be reduced to $4,088.

Reversed.

STONE, POLEN and KLEIN, JJ., concur.

Ammerman v. State, 617 So. 2d 836, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 4998, 1993 WL 140116 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

617 So. 2d 836 (Ammerman v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related