Amjad Malik v. Daniel Leal D/B/A Leal Construction

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided December 23, 2010·No. 02-09-00386-CV·Published

Opinion

COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH

NO. 02-09-00386-CV

AMJAD MALIK APPELLANT

V.

DANIEL LEAL D/B/A LEAL APPELLEE CONSTRUCTION

------------

FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY

MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------

On November 19, 2010, we notified appellant Amjad Malik that his brief

had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).

See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of

prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed

1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the

appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.

Because appellant Amjad Malik’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the

appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).

Appellant Amjad Malik shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let

execution issue.

PER CURIAM

PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.

DELIVERED: December 23, 2010

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amjad Malik v. Daniel Leal D/B/A Leal Construction, (Tex. Ct. App. 2010).

Amjad Malik v. Daniel Leal D/B/A Leal Construction (Amjad Malik v. Daniel Leal D/B/A Leal Construction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.