Amjad Malik v. Daniel Leal D/B/A Leal Construction
Opinion
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
NO. 02-09-00386-CV
AMJAD MALIK APPELLANT
V.
DANIEL LEAL D/B/A LEAL APPELLEE CONSTRUCTION
------------
FROM THE 48TH DISTRICT COURT OF TARRANT COUNTY
MEMORANDUM OPINION1 AND JUDGMENT ------------
On November 19, 2010, we notified appellant Amjad Malik that his brief
had not been filed as required by Texas Rule of Appellate Procedure 38.6(a).
See Tex. R. App. P. 38.6(a). We stated we could dismiss the appeal for want of
prosecution unless appellant or any party desiring to continue this appeal filed
1 See Tex. R. App. P. 47.4. with the court within ten days a response showing grounds for continuing the
appeal. See Tex. R. App. P. 42.3. We have not received any response.
Because appellant Amjad Malik’s brief has not been filed, we dismiss the
appeal for want of prosecution. See Tex. R. App. P. 38.8(a), 42.3(b), 43.2(f).
Appellant Amjad Malik shall pay all costs of this appeal, for which let
execution issue.
PER CURIAM
PANEL: MEIER, J.; LIVINGSTON, C.J.; and GABRIEL, J.
DELIVERED: December 23, 2010
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amjad Malik v. Daniel Leal D/B/A Leal Construction (Amjad Malik v. Daniel Leal D/B/A Leal Construction) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.