Amityville Development Corp. v. Town of Babylon

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Amityville Development Corp. v. Town of Babylon

30 A.D.2d 962, 294 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 7, 1968

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 30 A.D.2d 962 (Amityville Development Corp. v. Town of Babylon) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amityville Development Corp. v. Town of Babylon, 30 A.D.2d 962, 294 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1968).

Pincite

Opinion

Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 20, 1968, which (1) denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the separate defense in defendant’s answer and (2) granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements; plaintiff’s motion granted; and defendant’s cross motion denied. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. In our opinion the cause of action pleaded in the complaint accrued at the earliest on April 4, 1967, when the defendant town first refused to pay for one of the items claimed (cf. Edlux Constr. Corp. v. State of New York, 252 App. Div. 373, 374-375; Rason Asphalt v. Town of Oyster Bay, 8 Misc 2d 411, 41A-415, mod. on other grounds 6 A D 2d 810). Consequently, the filing of the notice of claim with the Town Clerk on July 12, 1967 was timely under the statute (see Town Law, § 65, subd. 3). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, dated February 20, 1968, which (1) denied plaintiff’s motion to dismiss the separate defense in defendant’s answer and (2) granted defendant’s cross motion to dismiss the complaint, reversed, on the law, with $10 costs and disbursements; plaintiff’s motion granted; and defendant’s cross motion denied. No questions of fact were considered on this appeal. In our opinion the cause of action pleaded in the complaint accrued at the earliest on April 4, 1967, when the defendant town first refused to pay for one of the items claimed (cf. Edlux Constr. Corp. v. State of New York, 252 App. Div. 373, 374-375; Rason Asphalt v. Town of Oyster Bay, 8 Misc 2d 411, 41A-415, mod. on other grounds 6 A D 2d 810). Consequently, the filing of the notice of claim with the Town Clerk on July 12, 1967 was timely under the statute (see Town Law, § 65, subd. 3). Beldock, P. J., Christ, Brennan, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

30 A.D.2d 962, 294 N.Y.S.2d 987, 1968 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amityville-development-corp-v-town-of-babylon-nyappdiv-1968.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack