Amit v. Popkin
This text of 675 So. 2d 261 (Amit v. Popkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This is an appeal following a jury verdict in favor of the appellee/plaintiff. The appellant was the defendant/counter-plaintiff below. The complaint filed by the appellee alleged that the appellant fraudulently induced him to enter into an agreement to have two boats constructed on behalf of the appellee by the appellant. There being no evidence to support a prior fraudulent intent not to perform under the agreement, we reverse the jury award and remand to the trial court to enter judgment for the defendant. We affirm the trial court’s granting of a directed verdict on the counterclaim.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
675 So. 2d 261, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amit-v-popkin-fladistctapp-1996.