Amit v. Popkin

675 So. 2d 261, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6781
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJune 26, 1996
DocketNos. 95-0588, 95-1113
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 675 So. 2d 261 (Amit v. Popkin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amit v. Popkin, 675 So. 2d 261, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6781 (Fla. Ct. App. 1996).

Opinion

GENDEN, MICHAEL A., Associate Judge.

This is an appeal following a jury verdict in favor of the appellee/plaintiff. The appellant was the defendant/counter-plaintiff below. The complaint filed by the appellee alleged that the appellant fraudulently induced him to enter into an agreement to have two boats constructed on behalf of the appellee by the appellant. There being no evidence to support a prior fraudulent intent not to perform under the agreement, we reverse the jury award and remand to the trial court to enter judgment for the defendant. We affirm the trial court’s granting of a directed verdict on the counterclaim.

KLEIN and PARIENTE, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Kaminsky v. Lieberman
675 So. 2d 261 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1996)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
675 So. 2d 261, 1996 Fla. App. LEXIS 6781, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amit-v-popkin-fladistctapp-1996.