Amiralli Embrahim Shroff v. United States
This text of 5 F.3d 1506 (Amiralli Embrahim Shroff v. United States) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
5 F.3d 1506
NOTICE: Federal Circuit Local Rule 47.6(b) states that opinions and orders which are designated as not citable as precedent shall not be employed or cited as precedent. This does not preclude assertion of issues of claim preclusion, issue preclusion, judicial estoppel, law of the case or the like based on a decision of the Court rendered in a nonprecedential opinion or order.
Amiralli Embrahim SHROFF, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 93-5061.
United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.
Aug. 17, 1993.
Before NEWMAN, Circuit Judge, COWEN, Senior Circuit Judge, and MICHEL, Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The judgment of the United States Court of Federal Claims, holding that it does not have jurisdiction of an appeal from the denial of a visa, is affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
5 F.3d 1506, 1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 20901, 1993 WL 309618, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amiralli-embrahim-shroff-v-united-states-cafc-1993.