Amira Al Dabbas, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al.

E.D. California

Amira Al Dabbas, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al.

DecidedDecember 1, 2025

Docket2:25-cv-02886

StatusUnknown

This text of Amira Al Dabbas, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al. (Amira Al Dabbas, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, E.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Amira Al Dabbas, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al., (E.D. Cal. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMIRA AL DABBAS, et al., No. 2:25-cv-2886-DMC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action. 19 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay proceedings in light of a lapse in 20 government funding. See ECF No. 12. 21 On November 12, 2025, the government enacted a continuing resolution that 22 extends funding.1 See Congressional Bill H.R. 5371. As such, Defendants’ motion for a stay is 23 moot. In light of the temporary lapse of appropriations, however, the undersigned will grant 24 Defendants 60 days from the date of restoration of appropriations to respond to the complaint. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 1 The Court may take judicial notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 of 28 matters of public record. See U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land, 530 F.3d 883, 894 (9th Cir. 2008). ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. Defendants’ motion to stay proceedings, ECF No. 12, is denied as moot. 3 2. Defendants are directed to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint on or before 4 | January 11, 2026. 5 6 | Dated: November 26, 2025 Svc 7 DENNIS M. COTA 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 AMIRA AL DABBAS, et al., No. 2:25-cv-2886-DMC 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. ORDER 14 UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, et al., 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 Plaintiffs, who are proceeding with retained counsel, bring this civil action. 19 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay proceedings in light of a lapse in 20 government funding. See ECF No. 12. 21 On November 12, 2025, the government enacted a continuing resolution that 22 extends funding.1 See Congressional Bill H.R. 5371. As such, Defendants’ motion for a stay is 23 moot. In light of the temporary lapse of appropriations, however, the undersigned will grant 24 Defendants 60 days from the date of restoration of appropriations to respond to the complaint. 25 / / / 26 / / / 27 1 The Court may take judicial notice pursuant to Federal Rule of Evidence 201 of 28 matters of public record. See U.S. v. 14.02 Acres of Land, 530 F.3d 883, 894 (9th Cir. 2008). ] Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED as follows: 2 1. Defendants’ motion to stay proceedings, ECF No. 12, is denied as moot. 3 2. Defendants are directed to respond to Plaintiffs’ complaint on or before 4 | January 11, 2026. 5 6 | Dated: November 26, 2025 Svc 7 DENNIS M. COTA 8 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 9 10 1] 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

Amira Al Dabbas, et al. v. United States Department of Homeland Security, et al., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amira-al-dabbas-et-al-v-united-states-department-of-homeland-security-caed-2025.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack