Amir-Sharif, Lakeith v. Quick Trip Corporation

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Amir-Sharif, Lakeith v. Quick Trip Corporation. Read the opinion of the Court — 2013 Tex. App. LEXIS 14498 →

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided July 24, 2013·No. 05-12-01143-CV·Published

Opinion

Order entered July 24, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01143-CV

LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Appellant

QUICK TRIP CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-13818-E

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s July 2, 2013 letter complaining that the Court has not

ruled on his motions for extension of time or filed his reply brief. The reply brief was filed on

June 17, 2013. To the extent relator’s letter can be construed as a motion, we DENY it as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Order entered July 24, 2013

In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-12-01143-CV

LAKEITH AMIR-SHARIF, Appellant

QUICK TRIP CORPORATION, ET AL., Appellees

On Appeal from the 101st Judicial District Court Dallas County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. DC-09-13818-E

ORDER The Court has before it appellant’s July 2, 2013 letter complaining that the Court has not

ruled on his motions for extension of time or filed his reply brief. The reply brief was filed on

June 17, 2013. To the extent relator’s letter can be construed as a motion, we DENY it as moot.

/s/ ELIZABETH LANG-MIERS JUSTICE

Amir-Sharif, Lakeith v. Quick Trip Corporation, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

Amir-Sharif, Lakeith v. Quick Trip Corporation (Amir-Sharif, Lakeith v. Quick Trip Corporation) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.