Amir Shaikh v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas·Decided August 30, 2013·No. 03-13-00396-CV·Published

Opinion

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN

NO. 03-13-00396-CV

Amir Shaikh, Appellant

v.

The State of Texas, Appellee

FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY, 53RD JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. D-1-GV-12-000872, HONORABLE SCOTT H. JENKINS, JUDGE PRESIDING

MEMORANDUM OPINION

Appellant filed his notice of appeal on June 4, 2013. On July 16, in response to

our notice that the clerk’s record was late, the trial court clerk’s office informed us that the

record would be prepared once appellant paid for the record and sent his Designation of Clerk’s

Record. On July 30, we sent appellant’s counsel notice that the appellate record was overdue.

We asked appellant to make arrangements to pay for the record and file a status report no later

than August 9, cautioning that the appeal would be subject to dismissal if appellant did not

comply with our instructions. To date, appellant has not responded to our notice, nor has he

arranged for the record to be filed. We therefore dismiss the appeal for want of prosecution.

Tex. R. App. P. 42.3(b). __________________________________________

David Puryear, Justice

Before Justices Puryear, Rose and Goodwin

Dismissed for Want of Prosecution

Filed: August 30, 2013

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amir Shaikh v. State, (Tex. Ct. App. 2013).

Amir Shaikh v. State (Amir Shaikh v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.