Amir Asherian v. Erica Ford
Opinion
[DO NOT PUBLISH]
In the
United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit
No. 23-14000
Non-Argument Calendar
AMIR ASHERIAN, HOOSHANG ASHERIAN, Plaintiffs-Appellees,
versus ERICA FORD, ALL OTHER OCCUPANTS,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia
2 Opinion of the Court 23-14000
D.C. Docket No. 1:23-cv-04460-JPB
Before JORDAN, JILL PRYOR, and GRANT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal is DISMISSED, sua sponte, for lack of jurisdiction . Erica Ford and all other occupants of a property owned by Amir and Hooshang Asherian appeal from the district court’s order remanding the case to state court. We lack jurisdiction to review the remand order because it was based on the district court’s lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c)-(d); New v. Sports & Recreation, 114 F.3d 1092, 1095-96 (11th Cir. 1997); Whole Health Chiropractic & Wellness, Inc. v. Humana Med Plan, Inc., 254 F.3d 1317, 1319 (11th Cir. 2001).
No petition for rehearing may be filed unless it complies with the timing and other requirements of 11th Cir. R. 40-3 and all other applicable rules.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Amir Asherian v. Erica Ford (Amir Asherian v. Erica Ford) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.