Amidon v. Benjamin

126 Mass. 276, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 234
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court·Decided February 28, 1879·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Gray, C. J.

Since the argument of this case, it has been decided that the lien of a petitioner under the Gen. Sts. e. 150, upon the interest of the person who owns the land when the lien attaches, is not defeated by a subsequent conveyance of the land from him to a third person before the filing of the certificate. Gale v. Blaikie, ante, 274. It would seem, therefore, that this petitioner might safely have treated the conveyance from the respondent to his daughter as made in good faith, and might have described her in his certificate as the owner. But if he chose to assume the burden of asserting and proving that the conveyance was fraudulent and void as against creditors and against himself as a creditor of the grantor, and to describe the grantor in his certificate as the owner, he was at liberty to do so, and, if he succeeded in such proof, it would be made to appear that his certificate truly described the only person as owner, who was, as against him, the owner of the land. The evidence offered was, therefore, wrongly excluded, and there must be a

New trial.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amidon v. Benjamin, 126 Mass. 276, 1879 Mass. LEXIS 234 (Mass. 1879).

126 Mass. 276 (Amidon v. Benjamin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

D. L. Billings Co. v. Brand
73 N.E. 637 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1905)
Richards v. O'Brien
53 N.E. 858 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1899)
Batchelder v. Hutchinson
37 N.E. 452 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1894)
Ettridge v. Bassett
136 Mass. 314 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1884)
Amidon v. Benjamin
128 Mass. 534 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1880)