Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

149 A.3d 497, 323 Conn. 916, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 295
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 27, 2016
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 149 A.3d 497 (Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney, 149 A.3d 497, 323 Conn. 916, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 295 (Colo. 2016).

Opinion

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 831, 142 A.3d 439 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had a right of equitable subrogation against the defendants, the residential tenants of its insured, under DiLullo v. Joseph, 259 Conn. 847, 792 A.2d 819 (2000) ?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney
180 A.3d 950 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
149 A.3d 497, 323 Conn. 916, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 295, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amica-mut-ins-co-v-muldowney-conn-2016.