Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney

149 A.3d 497, 323 Conn. 916, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 295

Supreme Court of Connecticut·Decided September 27, 2016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 831, 142 A.3d 439 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had a right of equitable subrogation against the defendants, the residential tenants of its insured, under DiLullo v. Joseph, 259 Conn. 847, 792 A.2d 819 (2000) ?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The defendants' petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 166 Conn. App. 831, 142 A.3d 439 (2016), is granted, limited to the following issue:

"Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the plaintiff had a right of equitable subrogation against the defendants, the residential tenants of its insured, under DiLullo v. Joseph, 259 Conn. 847, 792 A.2d 819 (2000) ?"

McDONALD, J., did not participate in the consideration of or decision on this petition.

Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney, 149 A.3d 497, 323 Conn. 916, 2016 Conn. LEXIS 295 (Colo. 2016).

Pincite

149 A.3d 497 (Amica Mut. Ins. Co. v. Muldowney) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related