Amherst & Clarence Insurance v. Cazenovia Tavern, Inc.

453 N.E.2d 1077, 59 N.Y.2d 983, 466 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3262
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 5, 1983·Published·Cited by 15 cases

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be reversed, without costs, and the case remitted to Supreme Court with direction to dismiss the action as moot.

This action is for a declaration as to the obligation of the insurer to defend appellant in an underlying tort action. Nothing in the submissions of the parties suggests that the intervening settlement of the tort action has not rendered the issues in the declaratory judgment action moot.

Any agreement or understanding the parties may have reached not to disclose to our court the fact or circumstances of such settlement, relating as the settlement does to the continuing viability of the appeal, will be disregarded. The attorneys for litigants in our court have an obligation to keep the court informed of all such matters pertinent to the disposition of a pending appeal and cannot, by agreement between them, foreclose its disposition on the ground of mootness or otherwise predetermine the scope of our review.

Chief Judge Cooke and Judges Jasen, Jones, Wachtler, Meyer and Simons concur.

On review of submissions pursuant to rule 500.2 (b) of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.2 [g]), order reversed, without costs, and case remitted to the Supreme Court, Madison County, with directions to dismiss the action as moot in a memorandum.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amherst & Clarence Insurance v. Cazenovia Tavern, Inc., 453 N.E.2d 1077, 59 N.Y.2d 983, 466 N.Y.S.2d 660, 1983 N.Y. LEXIS 3262 (N.Y. 1983).

453 N.E.2d 1077 (Amherst & Clarence Insurance v. Cazenovia Tavern, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Dynamic Event Group, Inc. v. Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
196 N.Y.S.3d 723 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
Technology Ins. Co. v. First Mercury Ins. Co.
2021 NY Slip Op 03128 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2021)
Matter of Gorski v. Phalen
2020 NY Slip Op 05655 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2020)
Dumond v. New York Cent. Mut. Fire Ins. Co.
2018 NY Slip Op 7853 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2018)
Stulz v. 305 Riverside Corp.
2017 NY Slip Op 4066 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2017)
Tri-State Consumer, Inc. v. Mintz & Gold, LLP
45 A.D.3d 575 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
Merkle v. Guardianship of Jacoby
912 So. 2d 595 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Yonkers Contracting Co. v. General Star National Insurance
14 F. Supp. 2d 365 (S.D. New York, 1998)
Pohlman v. American Alliance Insurance
247 A.D.2d 931 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1998)
New York Mutual Underwriters v. Burdick
196 A.D.2d 668 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1993)
City of Oklahoma City v. Oklahoma Tax Commission
789 P.2d 1287 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1990)
Lotz v. Lotz
135 A.D.2d 1007 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)