AM/FM International v. Huddleston

920 P.2d 815, 19 Brief Times Rptr. 1359, 1995 Colo. App. LEXIS 243, 1995 WL 501289
CourtColorado Court of Appeals
DecidedAugust 24, 1995
DocketNo. 94CA0964
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 920 P.2d 815 (AM/FM International v. Huddleston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Colorado Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
AM/FM International v. Huddleston, 920 P.2d 815, 19 Brief Times Rptr. 1359, 1995 Colo. App. LEXIS 243, 1995 WL 501289 (Colo. Ct. App. 1995).

Opinion

Opinion by

Judge TAUBMAN.

In this property tax case, the Property Tax Administrator (PTA) denied the application of petitioner, AM/FM International (AM/FM), for exemption from ad valorem taxation of the land and building which comprises its national headquarters in Aurora. AM7 FM’s application was based upon its claim [817]*817that it owned and used the property solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes. AM/FM sought review by the Board of Assessment Appeals (Board), which upheld the PTA’s denial of AM/FM’s application. AM/FM appeals, and we reverse.

. The following facts relevant to this appeal were established by stipulation of the parties in lieu of a hearing before the Board. AM/FM was incorporated in Colorado as a non-profit corporation in 1982. Its articles of incorporation state that it is organized “exclusively for charitable and educational purposes _” Further, in its bylaws, AM/FM’s purposes are characterized as follows:

Section 1. To foster the exchange of information, educational opportunities and research and development which will advance and promote the benefit of geographic and facilities management information systems.
Section 2. Further, to provide the benefits referred to above to utilities, local, state, and federal government and their agencies, other interested organizations and the general public.

AM/FM’s membership consists of both individuals and organizations that have an interest in computer mapping information management and related technologies. Computer mapping information management, in general terms, is a process to use computers to model and display infrastructural, cultural, social, physical, and economic information for solving complex planning and management problems for providers of water, electricity, natural gas, and telecommunications.

In 1993, AM/FM had 1,697 individual members and 249 corporate members. It has five classes of membership: individual, sponsor, contributor, user affiliate, and student. The dues and benefits derived therefrom vary among each class.

AM/FM effects its purpose through a variety of educational and technical programs and publications, using the property for which it seeks exemption for all of its administrative functions as well as the coordination of all of its activities. AM/FM’s key event is an annual conference which it coordinates and presents to enable its membership to attend technical presentations, to gain exposure to exhibitors displaying and demonstrating their products and services, and to receive a highly technical 1,000 page set of conference materials. The technical journal is the only one of its type available in the field of computer mapping information management.

AM/FM also publishes a newsletter to keep its membership informed of new developments in this field. Additionally, it publishes the best of numerous technical series papers focusing specifically on the particular disciplines of its user members. Further, AM/FM plans and conducts other forums and donates copies of its materials to libraries and educational institutions.

AM/FM’s conferences, forums, and sympo-sia are open to all members of the general public and, on the average, 65% of its attendees are not members of AM/FM. It also makes its publications available to the general public at roughly its cost of production and administrative staff time, with slight discounts for its members.

Additionally, apart from AM/FM’s small, salaried administrative staff, the conferences, forums, and other activities of AM/FM are coordinated and conducted by volunteers. AM/FM valued its 1993 volunteer services at $766,250 and the PTA did not dispute this figure. This estimate included the time expended to coordinate and conduct the conferences, forums, and symposia, and the preparation and presentation of technical papers.

In the stipulation, the PTA also agreed that, excluding the student class, members of three of the remaining four classes received benefits with a market value that exceeded the cost of their membership dues. When multiplied by the number of members in those respective classes, the total annual benefit exceeded their dues by more than $200,-000. In the remaining class, the estimated fair market value of the membership was only marginally less than the actual cost of the membership. In addition, AM/FM maintains annual scholarship and internship programs which, in 1993, totalled $27,000 in actual grants.

[818]*818AM/FM derives most of its revenue from conference and exhibit fees and membership dues. It receives no revenue from advertisements in its publications. No dividends or distributions of income are made to members. Further, while AM/FM has managed to accumulate a financial surplus, it is undisputed that its dues and fees are calculated to cover only operating costs and services and that AM/FM is not engaged in any activity to derive a profit.

In its appeal to the Board, AM/FM argued that it is a charitable organization entitled to an exemption from ad valorem taxation because its activities are educational and because they lessened the burdens of government. While the Board recognized that AM/FM is properly classified as a non-profit corporation, it concluded that AM/FM had not established its entitlement to a property tax exemption because its activities were not of the type that lessened the burdens of government. The Board did not address AM/FM’s contention that it qualified as an educational charity.

AM/FM presents its same arguments on appeal, and we conclude that it qualifies for exemption as an educational organization. Therefore, we need not determine whether its activities lessen the burdens of government.

The basis for the property tax exemption AM/FM seeks is Colo. Const, art. X, § 5, which provides:

Property, real and personal, that is used solely and exclusively for religious worship, for schools or for strictly charitable purposes ... shall be exempt from taxation, unless otherwise provided by general law.

Section 39-3-101(l)(g)(I), C.R.S. (1994 Repl. Vol. 16B) also provides for the charitable tax exemption as follows:

Property, real and personal, that is owned and used solely and exclusively for strictly charitable purposes and not for private gain or corporate profit if:
(A) such property is non-residential_

The power to construe the constitutional words “charitable purposes” rests within the courts of this state. United Presbyterian Ass’n v. Board of County Commissioners, 167 Colo. 485, 448 P.2d 967 (1968). See also § 39-3-101(l)(g)(III), C.R.S. (1994 Repl.Vol. 16B) which provides: “It is recognized that only the judiciary can make a final decision as to whether or not a given property is or is not used for charitable purposes within the meaning of the state constitution....”

The burden is on the taxpayer to establish the right to an exemption. See Broadmoor Hotel v. Department of Revenue, 773 P.2d 627 (Colo.App.1989). While tax exemption statutes aré strictly construed against exemption, each case must be resolved on the basis of its own facts. American Water Works Ass’n v.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Board of Assessment Appeals v. AM/FM International
940 P.2d 338 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1997)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
920 P.2d 815, 19 Brief Times Rptr. 1359, 1995 Colo. App. LEXIS 243, 1995 WL 501289, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amfm-international-v-huddleston-coloctapp-1995.