Amezaga v. Fernandez

168 A.D. 890

This text of 168 A.D. 890 (Amezaga v. Fernandez) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Amezaga v. Fernandez, 168 A.D. 890 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars eosts and disbursements, and the motion denied, with ten dollars costs, [891]*891upon the ground that there is no affidavit presented by the plaintiff explaining the reason for the failure to include in the original complaint the fact now sought to be set up in the amended complaint, or setting forth his grounds for believing the new allegations contained in the amended complaint, nor is his failure to present such affidavit properly excused, with leave to renew the motion upon proper papers. Present— Ingraham, P. J., Clarke, Scott, Dowling and Hotchkiss, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion denied, with ten dollars costs, with leave to plaintiff to renew the motion upon proper papers.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
168 A.D. 890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amezaga-v-fernandez-nyappdiv-1915.