Amey v. Granite State Fire Insurance

44 A. 601, 68 N.H. 446
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1895·Published

Opinion

Clark, J.

The plaintiff is entitled to judgment unless, as a part of the contract of sale, he did some positive act to aid the claimants in their unlawful occupation. The sale was not rendered illegal by the plaintiff's knowledge that the claimants would use the property sold for the advancement of their illegal business. Delavina v. Hill, 65 N. H. 94, and cases cited; Bryson v. Haley, ante, p. 337. No facts are found which show anything beyond the plaintiff’s mere knowledge of the intention of his vendees, and the case comes within the rule laid down in the authorities cited.

Judgment for the plaintiff.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amey v. Granite State Fire Insurance, 44 A. 601, 68 N.H. 446 (N.H. 1895).

44 A. 601 (Amey v. Granite State Fire Insurance) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Delavina v. Hill
19 A. 1000 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1889)