Ames v. Taylor

49 Me. 381
CourtSupreme Judicial Court of Maine
DecidedJuly 1, 1861
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 49 Me. 381 (Ames v. Taylor) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Judicial Court of Maine primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ames v. Taylor, 49 Me. 381 (Me. 1861).

Opinion

The opinion of the Court was ■ drawn up by

GIoodenow, J.

In my opinion, it appears from the evidence reported, that the wagons were legally seized by the plaintiff, on execution, and the seizure was not abandoned, nor lost, up to the time when the agreement was made with the defendant; that the agreement alleged in the writ is proved by two witnesses, and is satisfactorily established, notwithstanding the denial of the defendant, whose complicity with the debtor, in the fraudulent secreting of-his property may well be suspected; that said agreement is founded on a good and legal consideration; and that the defendant has failed to perform the same.

The wagons are alleged in the writ to have been of the value of one hundred and sixty dollars, and the testimony proves them to have been of that value.

Judgment for the plaintiff. — Damages, §160, with interest from November 15, 1858.

Tenney, C. J., Rice, May, Davis and Kent, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Johnson v. Breckenridge-Stephens Title Co.
257 S.W. 223 (Texas Commission of Appeals, 1924)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
49 Me. 381, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ames-v-taylor-me-1861.