Ames v. Shute

90 A.D.3d 1629, 936 N.Y.2d 586
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 30, 2011·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Memorandum:

On appeal from a judgment of foreclosure and sale, defendant contends for the first time on appeal that, inter alia, the mortgage loan documents should be construed together with a joint venture agreement between plaintiff, defendant and a nonparty. Inasmuch as defendant failed to raise that contention at Supreme Court, it is not properly before us (see Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984, 985 [1994]). In any event, we have considered the merits of defendant’s contentions that are raised for the first time on appeal and conclude that they are without merit. Present — Centra, J.P, Peradotto, Garni, Lindley and Sconiers, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ames v. Shute, 90 A.D.3d 1629, 936 N.Y.2d 586 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2011).

90 A.D.3d 1629 (Ames v. Shute) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DAVIS, RENAULD v. VALLIE, ESTELLE
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012
Davis v. Vallie
93 A.D.3d 1232 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)