Ames v. Scudder

Missouri Court of Appeals

Ames v. Scudder

20 Mo. App. 64, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 414

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 22, 1885

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 20 Mo. App. 64 (Ames v. Scudder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Ames v. Scudder, 20 Mo. App. 64, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 414 (Mo. Ct. App. 1885).

Pincite

Opinion

Lewis, P. L,

delivered the opinion of the court on motion to set aside order.

In this cause both parties appealed from the circuit court to the court of appeals. Here the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed in some particulars, and reversed in others. Both parties then appealed to the supreme court, which affirmed in all things the judgment of the court of appeals, and sent down its mandate directing that “.the said defendants and appellants recover against the said plaintiff and appellant their costs and charges herein expended.” ' A motion to order the taxation of costs in conformity with the mandate, was recently sustained by this court. The plaintiff now comes and moves that the order then made be set aside, and that the costs be taxed against the defendants. We are not at liberty to consider the grounds urged in support of this motion.

The mandate from the supreme court concludes the whole matter,

and all the judges concur in overruling the motion.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lewis, P. L,

delivered the opinion of the court on motion to set aside order.

In this cause both parties appealed from the circuit court to the court of appeals. Here the judgment of the circuit court was affirmed in some particulars, and reversed in others. Both parties then appealed to the supreme court, which affirmed in all things the judgment of the court of appeals, and sent down its mandate directing that “.the said defendants and appellants recover against the said plaintiff and appellant their costs and charges herein expended.” ' A motion to order the taxation of costs in conformity with the mandate, was recently sustained by this court. The plaintiff now comes and moves that the order then made be set aside, and that the costs be taxed against the defendants. We are not at liberty to consider the grounds urged in support of this motion.

The mandate from the supreme court concludes the whole matter,

and all the judges concur in overruling the motion.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

20 Mo. App. 64, 1885 Mo. App. LEXIS 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ames-v-scudder-moctapp-1885.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack