Home/Supreme Court of Connecticut/Ames v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

Ames v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles

806 A.2d 1058, 261 Conn. 923, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 463
CourtSupreme Court of Connecticut
DecidedSeptember 12, 2002
DocketSC 16831
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 806 A.2d 1058 (Ames v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Connecticut primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ames v. Commissioner of Motor Vehicles, 806 A.2d 1058, 261 Conn. 923, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 463 (Colo. 2002).

Opinion

The plaintiffs petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 70 Conn. App. 790 (AC 21320), is granted, limited to the following issue:

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that, pursuant to General Statutes § 14-52, the plaintiff was not entitled to recover punitive damages and attorney’s fees against the surety bond issued by the intervening defendant, Western Surety Company?”

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ames v. Commissioner
839 A.2d 1250 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 2004)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
806 A.2d 1058, 261 Conn. 923, 2002 Conn. LEXIS 463, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ames-v-commissioner-of-motor-vehicles-conn-2002.