Ames v. Ames

7 Pa. Super. 456, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 323
Superior Court of Pennsylvania·Decided July 29, 1898·No. Appeal, No. 17·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinions

Opinion by

Rice, P. J.,

This libel was filed in the county where the parties resided when the alleged cause for divorce arose, and where the defendant still resides, and the subpcena was served upon him. The fact that the petitioner was compelled to go elsewhere in order to earn a living, she not having any other residence in this state outside of the domicil of her husband, was not sufficient to prevent the court from taking jurisdiction. The majority of this court are of opinion that the case was correctly decided for the reasons given by the learned president judge of the 45th district specially presiding.

The order is affirmed and the appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ames v. Ames, 7 Pa. Super. 456, 1898 Pa. Super. LEXIS 323 (Pa. Ct. App. 1898).

7 Pa. Super. 456 (Ames v. Ames) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hoffman v. Hoffman
53 Pa. D. & C. 457 (Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas, 1945)
Hilyard v. Hilyard
87 Pa. Super. 1 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1925)
Shaw v. Shaw
72 Pa. Super. 191 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1919)
Mauser v. Mauser
59 Pa. Super. 275 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1915)
English v. English
19 Pa. Super. 586 (Superior Court of Pennsylvania, 1902)