Amerson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner

District Court, W.D. Arkansas·Decided October 31, 2017·No. 1:16-cv-01090·Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS EL DORADO DIVISION LISA DELAINE AMERSON PLAINTIFF vs. Civil No. 1:16-cv-01090 NANCY A. BERRYHILL DEFENDANT Acting Commissioner, Social Security Administration

J U D G M E N T For reasons stated in the memorandum opinion of this date, I hereby reverse the decision of the Commissioner and remand this case for further consideration pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). If plaintiff wishes to request an award of attorney's fees and costs under the Equal Access to Justice Act (EAJA) 28 U.S.C. § 2412, an application may be filed up to thirty (30) days after the judgment becomes "not appealable" i.e., thirty (30) days after the sixty (60) day time for appeal has ended. See Shalala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296, 113 S.Ct. 2625 (1993); 28 U.S.C. §§ 2412(d)(1)(B),(d)(2)(G). IT IS SO ORDERED this 31st day of October 2017. /s/ Barry A. Bryant HON. BARRY A. BRYANT U. S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Amerson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, (W.D. Ark. 2017).

Amerson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner (Amerson v. Social Security Administration Commissioner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shalala v. Schaefer
509 U.S. 292 (Supreme Court, 1993)