Amerson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society
This text of 153 S.E. 778 (Amerson v. Equitable Life Assurance Society) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1. Under the facts of the case, as disclosed by the record, the verdict in favor of the plaintiff, directed by the court, was the only possible legal verdict that could have been rendered. No motion for a new trial was made, and the only assignment of error in the bill of exceptions is upon the direction of the verdict.
2. It appearing to this court that the writ of error in this case must have been prosecuted for the purpose of delay only, the request of the defendant in error, that ten per cent, damages be assessed against the plaintiff in error, is granted.
Judgment affirmed, with damages.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
153 S.E. 778, 41 Ga. App. 565, 1930 Ga. App. LEXIS 989, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/amerson-v-equitable-life-assurance-society-gactapp-1930.