Amerson v. Bland

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA STATESBORO DIVISION CHRISTOPHER L. AMERSON, ) Plaintiff, v. CV 619-128 SGT. SUMNER; SMITH, Warden of Security; TERENCE KILPATRICK, ) Warden; YOLANDA BYRD, Tier Warden of ) Security; SGT. QUAN JACKSON; and ) LT. OSCAR WAYCASTER, ) Defendants. )

ORDER

After a careful, de novo review of the file, the Court concurs with the Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation, to which no objections have been filed. Accordingly, the Court ADOPTS the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge as its opinion, DENIES Plaintiffs request to proceed in forma pauperis, (doc. no. 5), GRANTS Defendants’ motions to dismiss, (doc. nos. 22, 29, 34), and DISMISSES this case without prejudice. The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to enter an appropriate judgment of dismissal, TERMINATE all pending motions, and CLOSE this civil action. If Plaintiff wishes to proceed with the claims raised in this lawsuit, he must initiate a new lawsuit, which would require submission of a new complaint. See Dupree v. Palmer, 284 F.3d 1234, 1236 (11th

Cir. 2002) (per curiam). SO ORDERED this _/ □ i of May, 2021, at Augusta, Georgia. AD A od 2 / Logs Z 7 XHOSA. / J.RANDAL HALL, @HIEF JUDGE \ UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOL RN DISTRICT OF GEORGIA