Ameropan Realty Corp. v. Rangely Lakes Corp.
760 N.E.2d 1281, 97 N.Y.2d 626, 735 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3275
Opinion
Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Neither the Appellate Division order, granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement, nor the judgment entered thereon, finally determined the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 18 [a] [3d ed]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Ameropan Realty Corp. v. Rangely Lakes Corp., 760 N.E.2d 1281, 97 N.Y.2d 626, 735 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3275 (N.Y. 2001).
760 N.E.2d 1281 (Ameropan Realty Corp. v. Rangely Lakes Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Hutzenlaub v. Portuondo
232 F. Supp. 2d 40 (E.D. New York, 2002)
Green v. New York
536 U.S. 926 (Supreme Court, 2002)