Ameropan Realty Corp. v. Rangely Lakes Corp.

760 N.E.2d 1281, 97 N.Y.2d 626, 735 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3275
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedOctober 18, 2001
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 760 N.E.2d 1281 (Ameropan Realty Corp. v. Rangely Lakes Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Ameropan Realty Corp. v. Rangely Lakes Corp., 760 N.E.2d 1281, 97 N.Y.2d 626, 735 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3275 (N.Y. 2001).

Opinion

Motion for leave to appeal dismissed upon the ground that the order sought to be appealed from does not finally determine the action within the meaning of the Constitution. Neither the Appellate Division order, granting a motion to enforce a settlement agreement, nor the judgment entered thereon, finally determined the action within the meaning of the Constitution (see, Karger, Powers of the New York Court of Appeals, § 18 [a] [3d ed]).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hutzenlaub v. Portuondo
232 F. Supp. 2d 40 (E.D. New York, 2002)
Green v. New York
536 U.S. 926 (Supreme Court, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
760 N.E.2d 1281, 97 N.Y.2d 626, 735 N.Y.S.2d 486, 2001 N.Y. LEXIS 3275, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/ameropan-realty-corp-v-rangely-lakes-corp-ny-2001.